1.11.17

Google Retake: Improving Content & Pruning Content Are Both Valid Strategies

The other day at SMX East, Gary Illyes from Google stirred the pot with SEOs by saying pruning content is not a good strategy to help with Panda issues. So Glenn Gabe submitted this question to John Mueller of Google to get his take on how Gary answered the question. In fact, Gary said the strategy of pruning content to recover from Panda filters should not work and probably should never have worked.

Most of what Gary said went against much of what SEOs have been practicing for the past several years since Panda launched. Hence the concern.

So John Mueller basically said Gary was wrong by saying both pruning and improving content are "valid strategies." John explained it is always preferred to improve your content but if you cannot do that then removing the content is fine.

He answered this question at the 6:22 mark into the video, here is the embed:

Here is the transcript:

Question from Glenn regarding kind of low quality content on a website and what the best approach there is. So I think there have been multiple hangouts where we say one thing and then conferences sometimes we say something else and it can be a bit confusing with regards to understanding what what you need to do.

And I think this is something where you really need to take a look at your website and take a look at your specific case. So in general when it comes to low quality content, that's something where we see your website is providing something but it's not really that fantastic. And there are two approaches to actually tackling this. On the one hand you can improve your content and from my point of view if you can improve your content that's probably the the best approach possible because then you have something really useful on your website you're providing something useful for the web in general. So that's generally when we talk with the quality engineers that's what they tell people to do. Well you clearly had a reason for putting this out now be serious about the content that you put out and actually make sure it's it's useful, make sure it's high quality. So improving it is probably the best thing to do in general because in the end that's extra value that you have for your website probably it's something you know something about or you have someone on your team who knows something about it.

On the other hand if you can't improve the quality of that content because it's just so much. Or maybe you auto-generated all of this content at some point and you can kind of like improve some small fraction of it but a large part is something you can't really change at all. Then that makes sense perhaps to be consistent there as well and say well I can't do anything about this so I'm just going to get rid of this and clean up. And cleaning up can be done with no index with a 404 kind of whatever you like to do that.

So both of those are I think valid strategies. And of course if you can make your content better I think that's that's always the best approach.

Forum discussion at Twitter.



from Search Engine Roundtable http://ift.tt/2gSJ0KP
via IFTTT

Google: Structured Data Not Required For Rich Snippets But Recommended

Google's John Mueller confirmed on Twitter that technically, you do not need structured data for Google to apply rich snippets in the search results to your site. John added that although it is not needed, it would be rare to see a search result with rich snippets that does not also use structured data. So obviously it is recommended that you use structured data on your site so that you can help ensure you get rich snippets in the Google search results.

Here are the set of tweets around this conversation:

Of course, Google doesn't want to be dependent on structured data for this but they are at where they are at now. In the future, who knows but for now, if you want to see rich snippets, I'd go with structured data markup for your pages.

Forum discussion at Twitter.



from Search Engine Roundtable http://ift.tt/2z66o2q
via IFTTT

Google Sends Survey To Search Console Beta Testers

Google has sent out a survey to the Google Search Console beta testers asking them complete a detailed survey for the Index coverage report. The email says:

Thank you for using Search Console!

In September we invited you to try the Index Coverage report in the new Search Console. We would love to hear your feedback on it, and would appreciate greatly if you could take 5 minutes of your time to answer a few questions that will help us improve the product before we launch it to everyone.

Martin Woods shared a screen shot of this email on Twitter suggesting that how the email was worded, that the beta might be out sooner than later.

Google has shared some details around this beta publicly after it was originally leaked. Either way the new report is pretty cool and I am excited for it to be released to all webmasters and publishers. So I do hope it does come out soon, but I am not too sure it will.

Forum discussion at Twitter.



from Search Engine Roundtable http://ift.tt/2z3UCmH
via IFTTT

Google Tests A Search Result In Local Knowledge Card

Sergey Alakov spotted another Google local test, this one shows a single search result towards the bottom of the Google local knowledge card. So right above the new questions & answers box you may see "search result" for the local knowledge card.

Here is an example screen shot from Sergey:

Google does show web results at the very bottom of a local knowledge card after you click into one. But this is showing a single search result that is more relevant to the business, normally the business's home page.

Forum discussion at Twitter.



from Search Engine Roundtable http://ift.tt/2xKJxW2
via IFTTT

Initial Google Rankings of Brand New Pages Will Adjust Over Time

Googlers Horsing Around

Googlers Horsing Around

Here is a photo from one of the Google offices of some Googlers literally horsing around. They are wearing horse masks, probably for Halloween. It was shared by Anna Potanina on Instagram who wrote "BoJack has a much larger family than he thinks."

This post is part of our daily Search Photo of the Day column, where we find fun and interesting photos related to the search industry and share them with our readers.



from Search Engine Roundtable http://ift.tt/2ykWElq
via IFTTT

The Next Big Thing: Digital Personal Assistants

The Next Big Thing: Digital Personal Assistants Featured Image Featured Image

Imagine a world where you had a digital personal assistant that you could access with voice commands from wherever you are through any internet-connected device, and it would handle all of your online interactions for you as you move about from home to the car to work and beyond.

This world is becoming a reality, and it’s not just useful for consumers—brands have a real opportunity to be early adopters. So how can your brand get in on the action? That’s what I’m going to talk about today.

For reference background, read my April 2017 post that rates the smarts of digital personal assistants.

The Rise of Digital Personal Assistants

Before we can understand how digital personal assistants work, let’s talk about some of the factors that are causing digital personal assistants to become so important today, and even more so as we get into the next couple of years.

Dramatic Growth of Voice Search

First, there’s the fact that voice search is growing dramatically in its prominence.  And it’s this technology that’s the backdrop for digital assistants. Here are a few interesting stats from KPCB’s 2016 Internet Trends Report presented by Mary Meeker.

The rapid growth of voice search is driving the rush to create digital personal assistants.Click To Tweet

Of particular interest is a statement from Andrew Ng of Baidu forecasting that 50 percent of all searches performed in the year 2020 will either be through images or speech.

Andrew Ng of Baidu forecasting voice search market

That’s a fascinating data point when you think about it. If that comes to fruition, we’re talking less than three years in the future—a pretty drastic shift.

One of the things that’s making this shift a reality is the rise of smartphone devices and their prominence. Because it’s still awkward to type on a smartphone keyboard, and because people are interacting with devices on the go, it’s convenient to say, “Hey Siri” or “OK Google” and just talk to a device instead.

This is already driving some significant changes in the penetration of voice search.

In fact, we conducted a survey here at Stone Temple Consulting of more than 900 U.S. smartphone users to find out where people are using voice search most. As many as as two-thirds of people in the survey are already comfortable using voice commands with their phones at home.

Graph compares how people use voice search in different environments

So, that means a very large percentage of the population is already engaging with voice search. That’s one of the big drivers of why digital personal assistants are going to be so important.

Rise of Internet-Connected Devices

The other major trend that’s happening is the fantastic rise of new types of devices that are internet connected, and that’s where we get into the Internet of Things (IoT).

Data from Strategy Analytics in 2014 forecast that by the year 2020, 75 percent of internet-installed devices will be something other than a PC, tablet or a smartphone.

What's behind the growth of digital personal assistants? One thing is rise of the Internet of Things.Click To Tweet

Graph shows the rise of the internet of things installed

So, all the devices that we think of as being internet connected today will be a small minority of the total number of internet connected devices. Think about that for a second: An internet-enabled TV, a thermostat, a refrigerator, your car. These are places where you’re not typing something, so as they get more sophisticated, your primary interaction will be voice-based.

This becomes a really important concept because it leads to a world in which interactions won’t happen through a browser. You won’t conduct your search, for the most part, through search boxes in a browser window. You’ll be using voice commands to talk to your personal assistant and get answers.

No Search Box Graphic

In this world, you can seamlessly move about and your assistant will be wherever you are, from your home to your car, and it will be able to pick up the conversation where it left off previously.

Graphic shows at least one Digital Personal Assistant is everywhere

For example, you might have left your phone in your office when you went to lunch, but you still want to check your flight schedules for later in the week. So, you just say, “OK Google” and you’re personal assistant wakes up through your car connection to the internet, and allows you to check your schedule.

You might then get your lunch, go back to the office and realize you haven’t actually set up a hotel at the destination city. You say, “OK Google” again, but this time, it’s your phone that responds.

You then tell the assistant that you need a hotel after you land in San Francisco and it remembers the context from the conversation you started in the car, and helps you book a room. As part of this it remembers your room preferences, and makes sure to get you a non-smoking room and a king bed.

When you go for a walk later, you realize you want to book a dinner the night that you arrive in San Francisco. So you say, “OK Google” again, and this time, it wakes up through your smart watch and allows you to book the restaurant of your choice. It knows that you like to eat at the Stinking Rose, so it suggests that to you, and when you say yes, it handles the rest.

This is the concept of the digital personal assistant—connectivity through any internet-connected device. Ideally, this personal assistant will be able to handle a tremendous amount of stuff for users online—without the user ever having to type in a query into a search bar.

Graphic shows there is one digital personal assistant for every need

Now, this only works if the various personal assistant providers have established connectivity through a lot of different hardware devices, and also have wired into a large array of different services and apps.

Graphic shows Digital Personal Assistants require service providers

This is where the market is going, and this is the reason why companies such as Apple, Microsoft, Amazon and Google all are investing heavily in personal assistant technology.

This is also why there is a great deal of opportunity in the arena of creating personal assistant apps, and smart site publishers are jumping on board early to tap into this burgeoning market.

Smart Speakers That Host Personal Digital Assistants

Part of the IoT space that may not be as familiar to some yet is the category of smart speakers. Smart speakers are standalone devices that you leave at home or in the office or anywhere that you want to interact with your personal assistant.

Examples of smart speakers include the Amazon Echo device, which has a software application in it that uses a personal assistant called Alexa. Then, there’s the Google Home device, which has the Google Assistant running on it.

Smart speakers haven’t been around that long, but the forecasts say that there will be more than 100 million of these smart speakers installed in the United States by 2024, or roughly 30 percent of the population, which is an amazing rate of penetration for such a new category of device.

To put that in context, look at the rate of adoption of technology over history in our civilization. The telephone took 110 years to reach a billion users. The television did it in a lot less time—only 49 years.

Graph shows pace of adaption of digital technology is set to accelerate

Things like smartphones and Facebook took eight years. It does not look like smart speakers by themselves will grow to 1 billion devices in 8 years, but they’re clearly growing very fast.

But, they do feed into the adoption rate of digital personal assistants, and I do believe that the category of digital personal assistants could grow to a billion in eight years. That is a pretty dramatic shift in the landscape.

It’s for all these reasons that I believe this is an extremely important category for digital marketers to pay attention to.

Apps for Digital Personal Assistants

Building an app for one of these assistants can provide great value to your target audience, and provide strong exposure for your brand.

Building apps for digital personal assistants could give your brand an early adopter advantage.Click To Tweet

With the IoT comes the opportunity for brands to create applications that run on personal assistants. To create an application for Amazon’s Echo device and the Alexa personal assistant, you would pursue what’s called Alexa Skills.

For the Google Assistant (including the Google Home device), you would develop what’s called Actions on Google

As a third-party developer, your brand can build your own “skills” or “actions” and plug into the Google Home and Amazon Echo ecosystems.

As a brand, you have an opportunity to be a pretty early adopter in a space that looks like it’s going to be extremely strong and important for marketers. Here are some reasons to consider jumping in early:

Graphic shows reasons to develop personal assistant apps now

At Stone Temple Consulting, we built an Actions on Google app (aka a Google Assistant app) that allows a person to ask SEO questions, including how to do certain kinds of SEO tasks, and incorporates an SEO quiz where a user can test their knowledge.

So next, I want to talk about building one of these things, and I’m going to focus initially on building an Actions on Google.

How Google Assistant Answers Queries: The Technical Details

The Google Assistant will use purpose-built apps if they’re available to answer a user’s query, and as a backup, use the web (pulling from featured snippet results).

The following chart is one that we’ve developed here at Stone Temple Consulting to show how the Google Assistant answers queries.

Diagram shows Google Home Intent Fulfillment

The chart above shows a basic flow of how things work when a user interacts with a personal assistant. For reference, the top row is simply the definition of the objects in the chart, and the bottom two rows show the actual flow.

If we start at the left, this is where the user speaks their query. Next, the intent is identified by Google, then Google returns a response.

Let’s say I want to ask Google Home: “What is content marketing?” There’s a process of parsing the query that involves identifying that the key phrase is “content marketing.” The words preceding that—the “what is”—are the prefix to the core part of the query, and that can take many forms.

In this example, I said “What is content marketing?” but I could have also said: “Tell me what content marketing is.” There are many different ways that users could ask the query, but in each case what they really want to know is what content marketing is.

So there’s an entire parsing process that you have to set up manually for Google Home. Our two input circles in the chart relate to that, and we’ll talk about that next.

An Overview of How to Set Up Actions on Google

To set up Actions on Google, you work with api.diagflow.com. Next, I’ll show you some views of what that interface looks like to give you some idea of what it’s like to work with it. (At any time, you can learn more about how to fulfill a user request in this help file here.)

First, you have to define or create a list of intent. In the following screenshot, you see “Default Fallback Intent,” “Default Welcome Intent,” “Define: 301 Status Code,” “Define: 302 Status Code,” “Define: 400 Status Code.” These are all definitions in the app that we built that users can ask about.

First, you have to define or create a list of intent. In the following screenshot, you see “Default Fallback Intent,” “Default Welcome Intent,” “Define: 301 Status Code,” “Define: 302 Status Code,” “Define: 400 Status Code.” These are all definitions in the app that we built that users can ask about.

In Diagflow.com, you can build a list of core terms. Then, in response to each of those, you build out an answer, as you can see in the following image where it says “Text Response.” This is showing an answer to the question, “What is content marketing?”

Screenshot shows how to build one an intent

Up top, you can see where it says “define content marketing.” Content marketing is the “intent” and “define” is the term we use to say what we are doing with this intent.

In this case, the prefix, or what we’re calling the “define,” might be “what is,” and then the “intent” is “content marketing.” Together, that tells Google Home what to do and to output the text response.

Look at the three check boxes in the middle. Because of the blue checked box, the first one says that a user can’t just say “content marketing,” but needs to have some sort of prefix to it that tells Actions on Google what to do with it.

You’ll notice the box for the suffix is not checked. That means users can ask the query: “What is content marketing?” and our app on Google Home will process that. In other words, no suffix is required.

To give you some idea of what some of the possible “defines” are, you also have to build out the following table. This table is where you tell Google what all the possible prefixes are.

Screen shot shows various of questions can be set to answer one intent

 

Keep in mind, in our example, “content marketing” is the core term we’re using. The user could say: “Define content marketing.” They could say, “What is content marketing?” They could say, “What does content marketing do?” All these things are examples of ways that users could ask the question. So, you literally have to build out all those examples so that the Google Assistant knows that they are all valid input questions.

The next image shows some specific definitions for one intent. What you’re seeing is in the first row where it says “define content marketing suffix” highlighted in orange, is the core query structure.

Then below it are a couple of examples. What does content marketing mean? This sort of language analysis is core to everything before you get off the ground.

And then we have another place where we specify the execute phase; this is where we marry the types of queries users might ask with the actual output from the device.

Screen shot shows how you can specify the execute phase for one intent

This is just a sampling of the extensive work you have to do just for a very simple app like the kind that we built at Stone Temple Consulting.

Once you’ve built your app, you need to test it. To do that, you connect to your Google Home device in Diagflow.com in what they call “test mode.” This means it’s not available to the world yet, but simply running locally for you. You can debug your app quite easily with this. You can learn more about testing the app here.

Once you’re happy with the results, you’ll need to submit your app to Google for certification or inclusion, so that other people can download it.

This is a process that I believe digital marketers should be beginning to learn now, because this form of users interacting online is going to be a very significant factor in the digital marketing landscape within two years.

That means, there is a very large opportunity to jump onboard with these types of apps now. The risk is that if you wait too long, you’ll get behind you’re competition, and frankly, I’m not a fan of that!



from Stone Temple Consulting http://ift.tt/2h1mPG4
via IFTTT