31.8.17

Capturing dark social activity can help brands avoid data commodification

The signs of programmatic maturity are everywhere, no longer just in aggregate spend figures. We see it as more and more brands buy into the full-stack reality and explore solutions that connect martech to ad tech and data to creative.

At the same time, there are talented people within brands and agencies who have mastered the new digital toolset and become fairly sophisticated about how those tools are used. There’s even what you might call a “programmatic workforce,” marketers with five-plus years of direct experience with the technology who are rising through the ranks. This all paints a picture of relative maturity.

But there’s one major downside to the maturation of programmatic, and it’s causing growing concern among marketers. In short, it’s that the marketplace for third-party data has become increasingly commodified and flattened. Third-party data is losing its efficacy because everybody is using the same stuff, and there’s nothing differentiated about it.

Now that programmatic targeting is table stakes, just having the capacity to execute a data-driven buy no longer provides an edge. Brands are finding that they need to dig deeper, segment better and target more efficiently.

Smart money is betting on first-party data as the answer to the problem of differentiation. Onboarding CRM (customer relationship management) data to match with third-party segments extends the market intelligence of the prepackaged audience segment into the brand’s own unique environment. This approach adds tons of value, but it’s best suited to retention and retargeting. For marketers focused on acquisition and reach, more is required to set the strategy apart from the competition’s.

For real differentiation, brands need to expand beyond CRM data to bring in all of the data that reflects the actions occurring within a brand’s ecosystem. The key may reside in “dark social.”

The power of ‘dark social’

With brands distributing content through email links, social platforms and influencer engagements, the extended reach of a brand’s content becomes difficult to represent in one place. A consumer’s entire engagement experience with the brand extends beyond the footprint of owned properties into the platforms and pathways through which people share the brand’s content.

Whereas in the past, publishers acted as the primary distribution points for brand content (whether in the form of branded content or traditional advertising), today, the consumers themselves act as distributors to their peers. And that sharing happens well beyond the trackable environments of Facebook and Twitter — email, text messages and IM, for example.

The trouble is that the proliferation of social and messaging platforms has radically expanded that ecosystem to the point where a large portion of those actions take place in what is ominously titled the “dark social.”

This dark social realm of second- and third-degree shares is “dark” because the consumer’s touch points with the brand take place beyond the average marketing toolset’s ability to detect and measure reach, and beyond that which is conveyed by the social platforms themselves.

That’s why it is essential for brands today to consider investing in tools that can peer into the dark social and measure branded content’s distribution — and to allow that data to be activated within the ad tech stack.

Activating dark social data within the ad tech stack radically amplifies the power of a brand’s first-party data assets and can set the brand’s programmatic playbook well beyond the reach of what can be bought and sold on the commodified data marketplace.

With the proper mechanisms in place to capture dark social activity, brands and publications can increase their audience well beyond what they had originally estimated.

Effective and efficient, if done right

Using dark social to amplify and extend third-party audience data will not only improve the effectiveness of the campaign, but also its efficiency. Chiefly, this happens in the form of money saved by not spending it on increasingly costly third-party audiences.

The key to realizing such efficiencies, however, is working with the right partners who can bring in the power of dark social capture without a ton of added fuss.

After all, while audience data costs money on the open marketplace, there are also real costs that come with building the infrastructure that maintains the integrity of that data and which positions it for deployment and activation.

The infrastructure needed to understand and manipulate the data is often more expensive than the data itself, and that’s true whether we’re talking here about human resources, artificial intelligence or both.

That’s why it makes sense to conquer the problem of data differentiation and dark social capture through thoughtful strategic partnerships before you bring it in-house — realizing the cost savings up front while mastering the process.


Some opinions expressed in this article may be those of a guest author and not necessarily MarTech Today. Staff authors are listed here.




from MarTech Today | Marketing Technology News & Management Insights http://ift.tt/2wLtUjT
via IFTTT

3 reasons I deleted your cold outreach email

Three Reasons I Deleted Your Cold Outreach Email | Marketing LandI’ve dedicated thousands and thousands of words to the value of outreach for your content marketing strategy — so much so that I’ve now found myself on the receiving end of pitches. And boy, has it been eye-opening (although you only need to look at @SmugJourno on Twitter to see that).

A positive relationship between your outreach team and key influencers is essential in getting your content in front of the right audience, but a lot of the time your outreach team is starting from scratch and needs to send the dreaded cold email.

Cold emails are one of the most effective and straightforward ways to get a response from someone you haven’t worked with before, but they’re also a form of communication that can easily step over the line between what is and isn’t appropriate.

In this post, I’ll walk you through three mistakes I’ve noticed in recent emails and offer ways you can avoid them during your next outreach cycle.

1. The email was clearly a template.

To: me@company.com

From: hopeful@anothercompany.com

Subject: Follow up

Hey Andrea,
Just wanted to follow up in case this got lost in the shuffle…

It didn’t. I simply deleted your first email.

Would love to share how ‘Another Company’ can make your team faster, more agile, and more strategic, all while adding time back to your days. Our goal is to help increase performance while eliminating those time sucks such as reporting, excel pulls, manual optimization and other monotonous tasks.

“Increase performance” and eliminate “monotonous tasks?” This email could have gone to anyone.

Some pretty cool things on our end that help you do all of that and then some.

Was that last statement even a sentence?

You get the picture, though. And considering an individual sends and receives an average of 112 work emails per day, one of the most frustrating things to see in your inbox is an email that has clearly been sent to thousands of people.

Obviously, when you’re promoting your content at scale, an email with a templated body can help speed up the process, but there are still ways to add a personal touch.

Personalized fields like first name and publisher name are two easy ways to make a recipient feel as if you’re actually speaking to them, not just blasting thousands of emails at once. You can also mention something you have in common with the person in either your introductory paragraph or as a postscript.

2. You didn’t prove why your content or service is relevant.

Another reason the above template failed? It didn’t answer any specific questions that relate to my industry. A great way to add legitimacy to any cold outreach email is to show that you’re on top of the trends within the recipient’s vertical — and provide a concrete example to back up this claim.

For example, if you can connect the content of your email to a current event that affects the recipient’s industry, whoever is on the receiving end will be more inclined to start a discussion with you based on the innate sense of urgency. People are always on the hunt for answers, so think about some of the current questions they might have and answer them.

3. It wasn’t clear what’s in it for me or what you wanted me to do.

I get a lot of incredibly bold emails that simply ask for a link. And I’ll be the first to admit that I admire their honesty, but I’ll also be the first to delete their email.

The most successful outreach emails get straight to the point, but the best ones emphasize why your content is a great fit for the specific recipient and clearly outline what both parties need to do in order to get your content in front of the right people.

So what are some ways to do this?

  • Exclusivity: If the content isn’t available anywhere else, the email should say that explicitly.
  • A strong CTA (call to action): I’ve received a ton of emails that go on and on about why I should take a look at whatever they’ve linked to, but once I do, what’s next? Should I call? Should I share something on social? Be as clear as possible.

The two biggest takeaways to remember before your next cold outreach efforts are to check whether or not your email is personal and whether it provides value. Will this kind of personalization take a bit longer? Yes, but this approach of quality over quantity will surely get the attention you want: someone clicking “reply” instead of “delete.”


Some opinions expressed in this article may be those of a guest author and not necessarily Marketing Land. Staff authors are listed here.




from Sphinn: Hot Topics http://ift.tt/2wkuR1x
via IFTTT

Lithium adds Jive-x tech to its customer community platform

Customer community/social management provider Lithium has announced it is acquiring Jive Software’s external community business, Jive-x.

The deal terms were not made public. Jive-x currently has more than 250 client companies for its customer and partner communities, and its key features will be integrated into Lithium. After spinning off Jive-x, Jive will focus on its employee-focused collaboration software.

Lithium president and CEO Rob Tarkoff told me via email that the Jive-x platform is “really strong in partner integrations, APIs, document management and event management,” and that the purchase is both about acquiring the tech and the customers.

[Read the full article on MarTech Today.]




from Sphinn: Hot Topics http://ift.tt/2eHqYL2
via IFTTT

Fuze CMO: A single source of truth for customer data ‘collapses under its own weight’

Virtually every marketer or marketing software vendor I interview says they want to establish “a single source of truth” about customers by getting rid of silos and setting up a single company-wide repository.

Everyone, that is, except Brian Kardon, CMO of business communication provider Fuze.

The former CMO of Eloqua and Lattice Engines, Kardon is not exactly a novice in dealing with customer data. (He will be participating in a keynote discussion on the evolution and future of martech at our MarTech Conference in October.)

“Each marketer has one system of record,” he told me, “and that ends up being marketing automation” like Salesforce’s ExactTarget, while salespeople have their own customer relationship management (CRM) systems.

A marketing automation platform, he said, contains “all our campaigns, all your activities, who opened [emails].”

“That’s your main system of record,” he said. You might also have, say, a specialized tool to track webinar activity, and that data ports into the marketing automation platform.

But, I asked, what about a central repository of customer data, like a Customer Data Platform. Some “single source of truth” about the customer, something that almost everyone I interview professes to want.

Nope, he said. “It’s not our taste. I need to have some walls up.”

[Read the full article on MarTech Today.]




from Sphinn: Hot Topics http://ift.tt/2xAPvZQ
via IFTTT

Why microsites aren’t always ideal for SEO

The question of whether or not to utilize microsites is an interesting topic of discussion for SEO.

On the one hand, microsites allow organizations to segment information and focus a site clearly on one topic. For instance, it’s not uncommon for an organization or association that hosts conferences to have a separate conference-focused website for registration and information aside from the main organization website (as Search Engine Land does with the SMX conference site). Or, if you own several car dealerships, you may want or need to have a separate website for each dealership location.

There are definitely times when having separate sites makes sense from a brand perspective. But there are also several reasons you may want to reconsider splitting your website into multiple microsites. Following are some potential SEO issues that can result from implementing microsites.

Inbound links

Since the original Google algorithm patent, inbound links have been an important ranking factor. So, how can they be affected by microsites?

Imagine you own a restaurant and have several locations. For example, we have a local restaurant in Charlottesville named Guadalajara with four locations. Each restaurant has the same menu. Do you need a separate website for each location, such as Guadalajara Pantops and Guadalajara Downtown?

In situations like these, I advise clients against using separate websites if possible because it can split and dilute the inbound link value. Just as the quantity and quality of links to an individual page is important, overall quantity and quality of links to the domain is also important.

If the sites are separated, they are working as two separate websites, essentially competing with one another in Google search results. If they are on one website, they are working together in Google search results.

With a single site, there are more inbound links pointed to the one domain, as opposed to splitting those links across multiple domains. In this scenario, ultimately the single site works better for SEO.

Site authority

It’s tough to really know what Google’s perceived authority for a site on a particular subject is. But what we do know is that Google values and looks for content along a similar vein as part of determining authority.

For example, if I have a blog and write almost exclusively about cats, but then one day have a random post about traveling to Paris, it can be assumed that Google would likely see my website as an authority on cats before it would consider my site an authority on Paris.

In this case, the Paris content and the cat content are very different — not even related to one another. The audiences may even be different. So, if I were planning to add more Paris content, it might make sense to have two different blogs: one that is a travel blog about Paris and a separate one about cats. Each can become its own authority on its own subject.

But what if the topic is closely related? For example, let’s say that I have a blog that features posts about cat nutrition and dog nutrition. The site could be considered by Google authoritative as a resource for overall pet nutrition because these are similar topics. In a case like this one, I wouldn’t recommend necessarily splitting the site into two separate sites because the categories/topics are related and can still likely be an authority in Google’s view.

Still, don’t think that just because one site has two very different topics, it can’t be an authority on each. A site doesn’t have to be an authority on only one topic. Before you decide to split your site into multiple sites, consider the ramifications of both site authority overall and what your future goals are. If you’re trying to show Google that your site should be an authority in a new space or new topic, you’ve got to build that authority over time.

Duplicate content

Let’s say your organization owns several dental offices, each with its own website. One of the office websites posts a blog post about tips for good dental health, and you’d like to share that post on the other offices’ website blogs. Great! Unfortunately, it’s easy to accidentally create duplicate content this way, especially if the webmasters for those office websites aren’t coordinating efforts well.

If you choose to use multiple sites, be diligent in using the canonical tag when sharing content between your websites to ensure that the content creator gets full SEO credit and that the other sites don’t inadvertently create duplicate content.

Analytics tracking

While technically, you can track traffic across multiple domains, it’s less than ideal and can be complicated to set up in Google Analytics. I have a client that has annual charity events, and each event is hosted on its own specific event domain rather than on the main charity website.

When a visitor navigated from the main charity website to the event microsite, source data for that visitor became “referral” rather than the source that brought the visitor to the charity site originally, such as Google.

This scenario leads to a great deal of lost information as a visitor moves from one site to another. In the view of Google Analytics, it’s as if this visitor moved from one whole company/website to another, and the background information for that visitor does not follow to the new site.

Maintenance

As Google Webmaster Trend Analyst John Mueller recently mentioned, and as SEO expert Jennifer Slegg reported, maintenance can be a major problem when you have many smaller websites. If you have two different sites, that means two different XML sitemaps to maintain. It means ensuring that two separate sites are mobile-friendly and optimized for page load speed. Having two separate sites can mean a lot of extra maintenance that is avoided with just one website.

Having multiple websites also introduces greater potential for errors. For example, let’s say you want to add Google Tag Manager (GTM) to each site. First, you may need to create separate GTM accounts and then create the specific containers for each site. Then, you’ll have to add the correct GTM code to each of the sites in the correct location. The more sites you have, the more likely you might accidentally introduce an error.

All in all, it’s likely best to avoid separate domain microsites for SEO. If the content is truly a separate entity, you may want to consider subdomains rather than microsites on separate domains, which keeps the content on the same domain but provides some level of separation.


Some opinions expressed in this article may be those of a guest author and not necessarily Search Engine Land. Staff authors are listed here.




from Search Engine Land http://ift.tt/2eHoqMM
via IFTTT

Google My Business fixes week-long reporting bug with photo insights

About a week ago, Scott Hendison reported that the Google My Business insights tools were not reporting accurately with the photos section of your listings. Google Insights within Google My Business shows analytics around your Google My Business local listings in Google Search and Google Maps.

A week ago, the data for reports around the photos you have in your listings stopped appearing and seemed to have completely paused. Then, on August 28, the data started to fill back up again, but there was a there was a gap between August 16 and August 20.

A Google spokesperson last night confirmed with Search Engine Land that they have finally identified the issue and have resolved the data issue. All data should now be fully restored and visible to Google My Business owners.

Here is how the report looked a week ago, compared to a few days ago, compared to today:

A week ago

A few days ago

Today




from Search Engine Land http://ift.tt/2vIcJMz
via IFTTT

The 5-step approach to becoming an analytical marketer

In this age of data-driven marketing, marketers are empowered by analytics as much as they are by creativity. Buyer personas — no longer built in the “set it and forget” way — are constantly evolving to better understand consumer behaviors. Marketers with analytical acumen will be the winners in the personalization game in this new landscape.

Today, CMOs (chief marketing officers) are the decision-makers of the technology stacks their companies implement in an effort to gain deeper customer insights. In fact, CMOs are expected to control more technology spending than IT departments this year, according to a Gartner survey.

Much of that spending is expected to go towards analytics, with CMOs planning to increase their spending on marketing analytics by as much as 375 percent in the next three to five years, according to The CMO Survey 2017. So, if you want stay ahead of the curve, here are five approaches to help you build an analytical culture in your organization.

1. Vanity vs. clarity metrics: Be mindful of your metrics

Never confuse motion with action.Benjamin Franklin

Marketers track a variety of metrics, but tracking the right metrics is the key to marketing success.

For instance, a lot of e-commerce businesses spend a large portion of their budgets on acquiring new visitors — hence the number of new visitors is one of the most important vanity metrics they focus on. While, in reality, once a new visitor comes to your website, clarity metrics will give you more information on that prospect’s behavior, such as products he browsed, whether he signed up, whether he made return visits and so on.

While vanity metrics are important on a superficial level, clarity metrics are the metrics that matter. Without an analytical bent of mind, it’s easy to slip into the wrong territory.

2. Choose your dashboards wisely

Marketers have to juggle between multiple data dashboards, most of which are complicated. Instead of leaving everything to the data scientists, arm yourselves with these dashboards to measure and analyze data for any trends and patterns.

Operational dashboards

These dashboards are based on historical data to serve up real-time reports of all marketing activities, performance stats of the campaigns undertaken and so on. For example, an operational dashboard of an e-commerce store will display information such as the average revenue per day or revenue distribution by gender and messages sent per channel.

A business can have different operational dashboards for various departments. But remember, these dashboards don’t interpret data by any means.

Advanced analytics dashboards

These dashboards are designed to offer data drill-downs at a more granular level. They’re highly customizable and driven by your business KPIs. This is what marketers spend most of their time on to convert data into actionable insights.

As a marketer, it’s important to ask the right questions in order to correctly customize these dashboards. You can also generate numerous on-demand reports to make predictions — for example, predicting the most profitable segment.

The CMO Survey (PDF) cited certain factors that prevent marketers from using analytics. Almost a third reported that the biggest factor is the lack of processes or tools to measure success through analytics.

The key is to choose a marketing analytics platform that will give you the freedom to create custom dashboards based on your KPIs.

3. Data without knowledge gaps

Over half of marketers struggle to seamlessly connect data across channels. Without a seamless data flow, a holistic customer view will remain a challenge.

A single customer view is the key to gaining customer intelligence and using this knowledge to personalize your messages for every consumer across channels. Aligning your marketing efforts with the customer journey strengthens customer loyalty and advocacy.

4. Deeper perspective towards segmentation

Marketers are swamped with so much customer data at their disposal that making use of it to personalize messaging for the individual customer has become a great challenge. To do more targeted, personalized marketing, marketers need to seek a deeper perspective into buying behaviors.

With a good marketing tool and an analytical approach, marketers can easily identify and focus on the customer segments that hold the most promise. For example, if like a lot of e-commerce businesses, you’re struggling with a high cart abandonment rate, instead of offering discounts to everyone, you can identify the carts with high-profit margin items, and then give discounts without incurring losses.

5. Data vs. gut-instinct decision-making

Marketers with analytical acumen will be the ones who will win the personalization game in the age of big data. Modern CMOs aren’t spending marketing budgets based on their assumptions; they are pairing data with analytics to optimize their marketing.

Analytics isn’t about charts and data. It’s about the capability to translate that data into actionable insights.


Some opinions expressed in this article may be those of a guest author and not necessarily MarTech Today. Staff authors are listed here.




from MarTech Today | Marketing Technology News & Management Insights http://ift.tt/2wL6aMJ
via IFTTT