31.8.17

Branch now offers its Deep Linked Email solution on a majority of ESPs

Let’s say you open an email on your phone about a new travel package to Italy. You click on a link in the email, and it takes you right to a screen in the Hipmunk travel app with the specific flight and hotel info.

That’s a key scenario for Branch’s Deep Linked Email solution, now available via eight additional Email Service Providers following an announcement this week by the Palo Alto, California-based company.

Branch said the new integration with the eight providers — Blueshift, Epsilon, Mailjet, Mailgun, PostUp, Sailthru, Vero and Zeta Global — means that its solution is now available on a majority of ESPs (email service providers), given that it is already offered on providers like SendGrid and Oracle Responsys.

Using the Deep Linked Email dashboard, a marketer can configure whether a click in the email link takes the user to an installed app, to the screen in the appropriate app store to download the app if the app is not installed, or to a related web page. With the new ESP partnerships, Branch is also announcing easier ways to configure deep linking settings in its dashboard.

If the email link is clicked on a desktop, the user is taken to a desktop web page. If the path is to the app download screen in an app store, the appropriate screen inside the app is automatically opened after the app is installed.

Branch CRO Eric Stein told me that this app-install-to-correct-screen path is not available on Apple’s deep linking solution, Universal Links.

Additionally, he said, Universal Links’ click traffic and attribution stats, showing the path a user took to a sale or other action, are not always available for all email clients. Branch’s solution, he said, tracks link clicks and attribution on all clients, while “link wrapping” that many ESPs otherwise provide to track Universal Links often breaks the link connection to an app.

Google’s comparable App Links for Android, he said, only works on Android 6 and above, while older OS-based devices — representing about half of all Androids — require a different solution.

Linking from email to apps can be an important path for marketers. A Criteo study found that conversion are more than 300 percent higher in native apps than in mobile web, and Movable Ink report says that 69 percent of emails are opened on mobile devices.




from MarTech Today | Marketing Technology News & Management Insights http://ift.tt/2eHWoRu
via IFTTT

Google says we don’t need no stinking location modifiers… or do we?

Last week, Google declared that the “near me” search query and other “geo-modifiers” (e.g., ZIP code, city name) were, if not dead, then certainly not worth spending your valuable SEO time worrying too much about:

In September 2015, we shared that “near me” or “nearby” searches on Google had grown 2X in the previous year. Now, just two years later, we see that behavior has continued to change. Make no mistake, people still use ”near me” to discover places of interest around them. But we’re now seeing a shift toward dropping location qualifiers (like zip [sic] codes, neighborhoods, and “near me” phrasing) in local searches, because people know that the results will automatically be relevant to their location — thanks to their phone. It’s kind of magical. In fact, this year, search volume for local places without the qualifier “near me” has actually outgrown comparable searches that do include ”near me.” [see data] Over the last two years, comparable searches without “near me” have grown by 150% [see data].

But, as you can see through Google Trends, it’s not just that “implicit” local search queries (searches for local places without the local qualifier) are growing rapidly — it’s that they have always had a much higher base volume as well.

So, we get it — the search term “tacos” is a better term to target than “tacos costa mesa.” However, Google treats implicit/explicit/”near me” searches differently. Just look at these different results (searches were all done from the same location with an incognito browser):

Tacos (located in Costa Mesa, CA)

Tacos

Tacos Costa Mesa

Tacos Costa Mesa

Costa Mesa Tacos

Costa Mesa Tacos

Tacos Near Me (located in Costa Mesa)

Tacos Near Me

While there’s overlap, literally none of the results above are the same. That tells us that Google evaluates all of these queries differently. Not only that, but according to our 2016 Local SEO Ranking Factors study (2017 version coming soon), it looks like Google is looking at different ranking factors as well.

Here’s how various factors correlated with high rankings in the Local Pack for implicit and explicit local search queries:

Explicit v Implicit Local SEO Ranking Factors

So, this requires a more holistic approach to location-based SEO. Local SEO isn’t just about fixing data accuracy problems, it’s about making sure that clients are effectively optimized for the myriad terms and paths that will generate them business.

[Read the full article on Search Engine Land.]


Some opinions expressed in this article may be those of a guest author and not necessarily Marketing Land. Staff authors are listed here.




from Sphinn: Hot Topics http://ift.tt/2xANJbl
via IFTTT

Google launches AdSense User First beta to test if fewer ads & better targeting can make more money for publishers

A small number of AdSense and AdMob publishers started receiving invitations to Google Adsense’s User First beta program this week.

The goal at this stage is to test new ways for publishers to make more revenue with fewer, hopefully more effective, ads and reward publishers who prioritize the user experience The program is meant to reward publishers that provide a good user experience — measured by site speed, ad layouts that generate high quality-clicks and low rates of users muting ads on the site — with priority access to new features. From the program page:

You were invited to this beta program because you offer your visitors a good web experience, e.g., your pages are fast-loading or your users are happy with the ad layout on your site. With this beta, by meeting certain requirements, you’ll get early access to new features designed to help boost your revenue and provide your visitors with better ad experiences.

Initial experiments

The feature testing will revolve around the goal of helping AdSense and AdMob publishers generate more revenue from fewer ads.

Targeting

The experiments will aim to go beyond the ad relevancy and personalization already aimed at signed-in users on the Google Display Network: “Your visitors who are signed into Google will see ads that they’ll want to engage with more.”

Ad load optimization 

Google hopes to find the optimal formula for showing fewer, more targeted ads while driving more revenue: “User First will start optimizing your ad load to create an even better experience for your visitors.”

To be eligible for the program, publishers must run only AdSense ads on their sites: “In addition, in order to adequately optimize the ad load on your site, we’re only able to provide the benefits on sites that serve only AdSense ads.” 

That means publishers won’t be able to plug into any other ad network or exchange to fulfill inventory while part of the beta program. The network exclusivity gives Google control to adjust ad load with this test group to better understand the impact on the user experience and publisher revenue.

As the beta develops, participants will get early access to additional features and new ad formats.

Publishers in the program will get access to a scorecard on the AdSense home page showing how they stack up against the qualifying criteria. They can opt out of the beta at any time.

This program is separate but of a theme with the Better Ad Standards the company announced it would uphold earlier this year. As part of that effort, Google will stop showing ads in Chrome that don’t comply with the Coalition for Better Ads standards, starting in early 2018.




from Sphinn: Hot Topics http://ift.tt/2xAJZXp
via IFTTT

[Report] Who owns the flights market in search?

Which brands dominate the US flights market in search?

A new report by Pi Datametrics has analyzed the entire US flights market to discover the most organically valuable search themes and players with the greatest share of voice across the market.

The search data was collected from across Google US with a view to identifying the search terms with the most commercial opportunity over the last four years, and trended to reveal demand peaks and declines across the travel industry.

‘International’ flights: Trended search themes | May 2016 – May 2017

Image source: Pi Datametrics Market Intelligence

So what does the data show, and what can marketers learn from it about the state of the flights market?

The difference between organic value and search volume

Trended search volume data is a strong indication of research and demand phases, but to determine when a search is most likely to actually convert, Pi has applied their proprietary Organic Value Score.

Search volume alone doesn’t always indicate value. Pi’s Organic Value Score averages out all of the metrics critical to conversion – including adword data – to reflect the true value of individual search terms, and their overarching search themes.

Looking at the search volume graph (above) in isolation, ‘Latin America & Caribbean’ appears to be the one of the most important search themes to focus strategy on within the ‘International flights’ market.

But, if we overlay commercial value, the data tells a slightly different story. ‘Latin America & Caribbean’ devalues significantly, while ‘Europe & Middle East’ retains its competitive edge.

Share of voice: Top sites across the entire ‘Flights’ market

Date: 7th June 2017 | Top 20 sites

Image source: Pi Datametrics Market Intelligence

Using a datapool of the most valuable ‘International’ and ‘Domestic’ search terms, Pi generated a vast snapshot of the entire US ‘Flights’ market (12,286 sites), to reveal the players dominating the industry.

Kayak own the US ‘Flights’ market

Kayak perform best both internationally and domestically, closely followed by Tripadvisor – which has recently transformed into an integrated review / booking site.

Here are just a few key insights:

  • The top 3 performers own 57% of the entire ‘Flights’ category.
  • All ‘Others’ beyond the top 20 own 10.1% of the ‘Flights’ market. Kayak, alone, owns more than double this.
  • The top 11 performers consist of online travel agencies, aggregators or integrated review and booking sites. These sites own 86% of the entire market.
  • An airline doesn’t appear until position 11, and only owns 0.6% of the category.

Image source: Pi Datametrics Market Intelligence

Which airline groups own the entire ‘Flights’ category?

  • Priceline Group owns 33.5% of the entire market – that’s four times more share than the entire remaining market, beyond the top 20
  • Expedia Inc owns 25.6% of the entire market
  • All ‘Others’, beyond the top 20, own a tiny 7.7% of the market
  • Airline providers can use this market share data to establish the best aggregators to resell their ‘Flights’

When combined, Expedia Inc and Priceline Group own nearly 60% of the entire US ‘Flights’ market. This is astronomical, and has created an ‘illusion of choice’ across the digital travel landscape.

  • Priceline is the 6th largest internet company by revenue ($10.64bn USD).
  • Expedia is the world’s 10th largest internet company by revenue ($8.77bn USD).

These revenue statistics just prove the success of their digital duopoly.

What can marketers and SEOs in the travel industry learn from the data about the most valuable search terms? Knowing their most valuable content gives businesses the foresight to dictate strategy.

From Pi’s trend chart, we can see that Europe and Middle Eastern flights have the highest Organic Value across the US ‘International flights’ market.

Aggregators, airlines and integrated booking sites can use this data to plan marketing activity around the most valuable flights.

Why is the online flights market so heavily dominated by just two companies?

Priceline group and Expedia own significant search real estate, and dominate the flights industry.

We can’t know exactly how these groups achieve their success, but we can presume that each brand prioritizes search throughout the business.

What’s more, these groups have an array of interrelated digital assets, which provide greater opportunity for comprehensive link infrastructures. This would only serve to boost their presence across the search landscape.

Based on the data, we can also see that online travel agencies, aggregators and booking sites decisively outrank airlines themselves in almost all cases. So why is this?

Based on their business offering, aggregators and OTAs offer a variety of content covering all areas of the flights market.

As direct providers, airlines may have less opportunity to match this offering, which could in turn impede market share.

The full report can be downloaded from the Pi Datametrics website.



from Search Engine Watch - Latest http://ift.tt/2em7kDA
via IFTTT

Earth Networks CMO says martech delivers a lasting first impression within the prospect experience

Earth Networks CMO Anuj Agrawal has more than a decade leading marketing strategy for B2B data and organizations focused on SaaS (software as a service).

“I’ve lived and learned what it takes to drive customer acquisition, identify cross-sell opportunities and maximize retention,” says Agrawal. The CMO says his background spans all different levels of business maturity, working with everyone from venture-backed organizations to later-stage companies.

In his current role, Agrawal oversees all marketing and product functions for Earth Networks, a technology-driven solution that helps mitigate weather-related financial, operational and human risks for numerous industries, including airports, broadcast companies and energy and utility organizations.

According to Agrawal, the prospect experience is about making a great impression from the very first touch point — and for him, martech plays a crucial role in that experience. He uses an example of a brick-and-mortar retail store greeter to emphasize his case.

“It’s like walking into a department store and being greeted by someone who is waiting for their shift to end or someone who sincerely wants to help you solve your need. That is when a first impression is born,” explains Agrawal. “From a marketer’s perspective, that can be the first place someone sees your brand. The language and messaging you use in the first email the prospect receives, or the customer focus your sales team has during the first sales call.”

The way Agrawal sees it, martech fits into that journey by giving brands insight into market needs — allowing them to get into their prospect’s head and empathize with whatever their business struggle may be.

“Whether through surveys, intent information [or] other behavioral queues, you can craft your messaging dynamically for each prospect’s unique pain point.”

Agrawal will be joining the CEO and founder of IntelliPhi, Anand Thaker, to discuss how companies are using marketing technology throughout the customer-to-prospect journey at this year’s MarTech Conference in Boston.

Where does marketing technology play the most significant role when determining the lifetime value (LTV) of a prospect-turned-customer relationship?

Agrawal: You can break down LTV into two basic components: pricing and renewal rates. Customers like to do business with people they like.

The first impression I spoke about earlier sets the stage for a potentially long relationship if you can take that first impression and snowball its effect by demonstrating the value you can bring to the table. You can tailor the actions you take to get them through the funnel early in the process by capturing information on your prospect through their journey via behavioral tracking tools, their interaction with your content and one-on-one conversations.

Once they are ready to buy, having technology to help test and optimize pricing can then have significant impact over the LTV of that customer over time. Using A/B testing and price optimization tools can help optimize here.

After they become a customer, your focus on renewals will be largely dependent on your ability to successfully onboard the customer so they begin getting value out of the product as soon as possible with the least amount of friction and provide first-class support via that customer’s preferred channels of engagement.

Some will prefer self-service support, others will want to chat within the product, and others may like the old-fashioned phone number to ring. Enabling the preferred support models for each customer in a personalized way makes for a happy customer.

What about customer acquisition costs (CAC)? How do martech tools impact the cost of acquiring customers?

Agrawal: Similar to LTV, CAC can be broken down into two primary components: cost per lead and conversion rates.

If you break these components down, you look for tools that help you lower your cost per lead. The lower your cost per lead and higher your conversion rates through the funnel, the lower your overall CAC will be.

Optimizing your cost per lead is really a function of strong segmentation, so you spend your marketing dollars in targets and with people who will appreciate your value proposition. You’ll also need to understand which marketing channels to use to reach those specific segments in the most efficient and cost-effective way.

Your marketing automation will likely house most of your segmentation intelligence. You may have access to channel intelligence you’ll want to look at directly from those sources — social media, AdWords, display ad platforms, content syndication and others you may be using.

For conversion rate optimization, you’ll need to find the tools to help you understand attribution of each action and channel, and its impact on conversion. Your automation platform may have basic tools to help, but you may want to leverage more full-featured analytics platforms to get granular.

In your opinion, how important is creating a ‘personalized’ prospect experience for B2B marketing organizations?

Agrawal: In today’s world, everyone wants personalization. Even traditional segmentation based on firmographics is not effective anymore.

Your buyers are individuals and have different motivations that you can’t tell from knowing how many employees they have, or what their annual revenue is. With new intent-identifying tools, you can find out what people are actively searching for.

In Salesforce’s recent State of Marketing report, 65 percent of business buyers said they would switch brands if a vendor doesn’t personalize communications to their company. I’d actually interpret that to mean they expect personalization to them personally more than their company.

At the end of the day, purchase decisions are made by individuals.

Do you think most anchor platforms — CRMs and CDPs — offer the basic necessities to start a successful relationship with a prospect, or do you think most companies need to go beyond these platforms?

Agrawal: Many marketers rely on marketing automation and CRM tools for all their activities. While these can form the foundation of your martech, there are several point solutions that should be leveraged to plug into these platforms for specific use cases.

Oftentimes, the marketing automation interfaces are good for some features, and not for others. For features that are not user-friendly, you may need to look at other point solutions that are easier to leverage and interpret. You may be reluctant to spend money on another tool for a feature you theoretically already have, but if the feature can make meaningful impact to your marketing processes, then the investment is worth it.

After all, if you have a capability that is hard to use, you just won’t end up using it. In fact, only 3 percent of marketers cite getting full value out of their martech tools (Sands Walker State of Marketing 2017).

Where do you think most marketers are missing the boat when it comes to using martech in their prospecting efforts?

Agrawal: The biggest gap I see and have been hearing about is with how you tie all this martech together to get a full view of the prospect journey and how all the touch points can be viewed collectively to identify deeper insights.

Most tools have analytics embedded within them, so it’s easy to see on a relative basis how one tactic within the same tool performed over another tactic. But getting cross-platform insights is where many teams still struggle.

These insights would provide better intelligence to know what messaging, channels and content may resonate with various personas or target markets — leading to better relationships and a more efficient funnel conversion.

For marketers who want to fine-tune their martech stack to better align with the prospect experience, what technology do you think they should be considering?

Agrawal: With the frantic pace of change in martech, it’s important for marketers to invest time understanding the landscape of available technologies. The demands on today’s marketer are increasing, and using technology to optimize your marketing operations and execution can have a significant ROI.

An evaluation of a tool can take several months to fully understand its value and relevance to your organization. When you can, leverage peers to shorten the list of tools to evaluate. Be sure to form a strong relationship with your account managers representing your existing martech so you know what’s on their roadmap.

With more than 5,000 vendors, the martech landscape is crowded, and differentiation is highly sought after. Vendors are going to be innovating and encroaching into adjacent areas of martech. Before you decide to purchase a new tool, do your diligence to see if you may be getting a variety of that tool in the near future within an existing product.

Also, social media players are increasingly becoming competitors in the martech space. Facebook Live is becoming an integrated content creation and distribution tool. LinkedIn is growing its popularity as a publishing platform.

Remember when Facebook went public and their revenue strategy was uncertain? Their stock ascent since then is a clear indication — with their growing and engaged audiences — of their ability to create content. Facebook’s ability to target on highly specific criteria will make them a continued force in martech.

Keep your pulse on what the social media leaders are doing.

If you’re headed to the MarTech Boston Conference, be sure to attend Anuj Agrawal’s session on Tuesday, October 3. As part of the conference’s marketing track, “From Prospect to Reference Customer: Maximize Lifetime Value with Martech,” Agrawal will be discussing the role of martech throughout the customer journey with IntelliPhi CEO and Founder Anand Thaker.




from MarTech Today | Marketing Technology News & Management Insights http://ift.tt/2eHHzys
via IFTTT

Google Shopping gets top spot impression share & product diagnostics reporting

Each year, Google rolls out several new features ahead of the holidays for retail advertisers. This year’s updates have started coming out.

The company introduced a new metric and new reporting for Shopping campaign advertisers — only in the new AdWords interface.

The new metric, called absolute top impression share, reports how often Shopping ads and Local Inventory ads appear in the first spot on mobile and desktop. Google says that during Q4 last year, the first Shopping ad on mobile saw up to three times more engagement than the other spots.

On the Products page, a new diagnostics report lets advertisers dig deeper into product status issues in AdWords.

 

These features can be added to the list of features exclusive to the new AdWords interface — what Google calls the new AdWords experience — that’s rolling out to advertisers through this year.




from Search Engine Land http://ift.tt/2xPw0MA
via IFTTT

Evaluating PPC talent, part 2: The test

Previously, we discussed how to find good PPC candidates for your particular company, but now it’s time to evaluate those candidates.

It comes down to this: You’ve held dozens of interviews with candidates almost impossible to tell apart. They all have similar credentials. They’ve worked in the right industry or environment, have used similar tools to what your paid media team uses and didn’t hesitate to answer your questions. But what’s next?

The technical assessment of your PPC hire may be the thing you’ve most overlooked, and it can often lead to a complete disaster.

How do we evaluate PPC talent?

You cannot properly assess how someone will fit into your team and impact your business simply by reviewing resumes and asking them a few questions to make sure they speak the language.

Unfortunately, there is also no one-size-fits-all assessment your team can find online and use. You have to start by taking an honest look at your work environment and understanding the person who will be required for the job. What tasks would this person be expected to complete daily, weekly or monthly?

If you’re a SaaS (software as a service) startup in need of speed and growth, you simply cannot afford to hire someone who hasn’t been through that; bringing on PPC manager from a local digital agency won’t get the job done. Your hire will need to understand how to deliver a plan of upcoming experiments at scale and execute on them quickly. There can’t be a learning curve.

If you’re an agency, your hire might need to be a better public speaker and salesperson in addition to having technical PPC knowledge, and they will need be able to create (and explain) reports.

By understanding the specifics of the position and crafting a test around them, you are off to the right start. And while there is no one-size-fits-all, I can share three tests I highly recommend.

Test #1: The fake report

The fake report test might be my favorite, wherein you deliver an interviewee a fake dataset for analysis. Present a sample report and ask for recommendations based on the data. Hopefully, they will dig into topics like the following:

  • Suggestions on how to re-allocate budget for efficiency.
    • For search, this might mean indicating search impression share.
    • For social, this might mean indicating audience size and daily budget.
  • What channels should be tested, given the business goals?
    • Also, did they ask you about the primary KPIs for your ad campaigns? If not, it’s likely not the right fit.
  • Is there an appropriate mix of prospecting and retargeting?
  • Are campaigns organized in a way that makes sense? Should structural changes be made?

The suggestions above are not exhaustive, but the perfect candidate has these types of questions and thoughts from looking at your data. Let them show you how they think and make decisions.

If you use this test, consider throwing in something really strange. Give your potential hires something to question, and see what they come up with. I recommend something subtle, like duplicating click numbers several times, or having the total spend not add up — small details that would be important to capture if they were incorrect. After all, a few lines of data could seriously throw off your day, or even your month.

Here’s an example of a fake dataset you might present to your candidates for analysis, with inconsistencies highlighted in red. (Obviously, don’t highlight your inconsistencies for the candidates!)

Of course, not catching these inconsistencies shouldn’t keep you from hiring someone who is otherwise an absolutely perfect fit. But when each candidate seems to be almost identical, small details like this can be great differentiators. You want the person who digs most deeply into the data and sees inconsistencies. Incorrect data leads to incorrect analyses — and possibly incorrect actions. Incorrect data can mean pixels and tracking codes are firing improperly.

Test #2: A competitive analysis

There are several things that advertisers like to do, and checking out the competition is one of them. If you’re hiring for a position where they will have to touch Facebook Ads, the candidate who knows to follow competitor brands, engage with posts, or even go to their site and get into retargeting pool is the one to pursue.

One of the best weapons advertisers have in Facebook is to see how ads are being targeted. If a candidate is seeing prospecting ads from your competitors and has the foresight to check if it’s lookalike targeting or something more complex, hire them.

In AdWords, a hire should be able to not only have an understanding of keywords competitors might be using, but start to develop a feel for how each brand positions themselves in search. Ask candidates to evaluate the search landscape and come to you with estimated CPCs, top keywords, ad extensions and copy competitors are using, to begin building a complete picture of what your competitors are doing. With this information gathered, what opportunities do they see, and what recommendations can they make?

This test has several benefits: Candidates will have a better understanding of what first steps to make if hired, and you are provided with some much-needed outside perspective that can further inform your decision. Again, the key here is to find tests that would be applicable to the daily work your new hire will be doing, and checking out the competition will surely fall into that category.

Test #3: Next month’s budget

This test requires a willingness to share your current spend and results, but it will likely be worth it. Have the final candidates sign an NDA (non-disclosure agreement), then grant read-only Google Analytics access and share your most recent budget. Budget planning, especially for channel owners who will not have a direct supervisor managing this for them, is a 100 percent essential skill and cannot be overlooked.

Now, you won’t be able to judge from this exercise how well these candidates can stick to a budget, but a candidate who can identify areas where you are overspending or underspending — as well as new opportunities for test spend and a plan to execute — is one worth being excited about.

If you’re a high-growth organization that isn’t asking for someone to just conduct daily maintenance, but needs someone to optimize and then scale quickly, you need to evaluate more than just a potential hire’s PPC knowledge. General business skills, like budget allocation, are crucial to the position.

Customize your test for your business

Feel free to tweak any of the above tests to best fit your hiring needs. Again, I can’t stress enough that the most important step in creating a test for potential candidates is doing a thorough evaluation of what your new hire will be doing on a daily, weekly and monthly basis. Identify all the skills they will need, and start testing for relevant skills.

Hiring PPC talent isn’t easy. But when you’ve made sure your job listing accurately details your expectations and crafted tests to make sure candidates are the right fit, you’re going to make the process a lot simpler.


Some opinions expressed in this article may be those of a guest author and not necessarily Search Engine Land. Staff authors are listed here.




from Search Engine Land http://ift.tt/2iJaR42
via IFTTT